FY2027 NDAA provisions explorer — search the defense bill's key items and dollar figures
Answer 'what's in the 2027 NDAA and where does each part stand?' with the real provisions, not a headline.
What's Actually in the 2027 NDAA
FY2027 NDAA provisions explorer — search the defense bill's key items and dollar figures
Search the major provisions and toplines of the fiscal 2027 National Defense Authorization Act — what each does, its dollar figure where one is published, and where it stands (House-passed, Senate committee, disputed, or blocked from a vote).
This bill is not law. These are provisions in the House-passed bill (H.R. 8800) and the Senate committee bill (S. 4784) as of July 22, 2026; figures and language can change in a House-Senate conference or be dropped entirely. Authorization amounts set policy and ceilings, not final spending.
| Total authorization | Authorizes roughly $1.14 trillion for national defense in fiscal 2027 — the amount the administration requested for programs in the Armed Services committees' jurisdiction. | ~$1.14 trillion | In House-passed bill; Senate committee version slightly lower |
| Increase over 2026 | CBO estimates the bill authorizes about $252 billion (28%) more than the $891 billion in discretionary funding appropriated for defense in fiscal 2026. | +$252.4 billion | Per CBO cost estimate of H.R. 8800 |
| Troop pay raise — baseline | The statutory across-the-board raise set by the Employment Cost Index formula, effective January 1, 2027, if Congress adopts no larger increase. | 3.6% | Baseline in both chambers' bills |
| Troop pay raise — House (tiered) | The House backs the administration's tiered raise: 7% for junior enlisted (E-5 and below), 6% for E-6 through O-3, and 5% for O-4 and above. | 7% / 6% / 5% | In House-passed bill; rejected by Senate committee |
| Troop pay raise — Senate (flat) | The Senate Armed Services Committee rejected the tiered plan and kept a flat 3.6% raise for all ranks, citing the 2024 Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation. | 3.6% flat | In Senate committee bill (S. 4784) |
| Section 219 — U.S.-Israel defense tech | Directs the defense secretary to name a Pentagon 'executive agent' to run a U.S.-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative covering joint research, testing, and industrial cooperation. | — | In House-passed bill; amendment to strike it (Massie-Khanna) blocked from a floor vote |
| Shipbuilding jobs (Golden amendment) | Bars the Pentagon from sending U.S. shipbuilding work overseas and adds funding for another destroyer built at Bath Iron Works in Maine. | — | Adopted in House-passed bill |
| Indo-Pacific microreactor | Creates a program to deploy a transportable nuclear microreactor within the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command area of responsibility. | — | In House-passed bill |
| Indo-Pacific training environment | Establishes a synthetic (simulated) training environment to support Indo-Pacific operations. | — | In House-passed bill |
| Reconciliation defense funding (separate) | The budget request assumed about $350 billion in additional mandatory defense funding enacted through a separate reconciliation law — this is NOT part of the NDAA. | ~$350 billion | Separate from the NDAA; excluded from H.R. 8800 |
How this is calculated
Each row summarizes a provision or topline as reported by Congress.gov, the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, the Congressional Budget Office, the Congressional Research Service, and named member offices. Dollar figures are authorizations (ceilings and policy), not final spending, which is set later in appropriations. The status column reflects the legislative stage as of July 22, 2026, and notes where the House-passed bill (H.R. 8800) and the Senate committee bill (S. 4784) differ. Where no separate dollar figure is published for a provision, the amount is shown as a dash.
Data as of July 21, 2026 · verified July 21, 2026 · v1
Assumptions, limitations & sources
Assumptions
- · Figures and text reflect the bills as they stood on July 22, 2026; a House-Senate conference can change or drop any of them.
- · Authorization amounts set ceilings and policy; actual money is provided by separate appropriations bills.
Limitations
- · This is not a complete list of the bill's many hundreds of provisions — it covers the items most in the news.
- · The NDAA is not law: the full Senate must still pass its version, the chambers must reconcile in conference, and the president must sign it.
- · Some provisions have no separately published dollar figure and are shown with a dash.
Sources
- H.R. 8800 — National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 — U.S. Congress (Congress.gov), checked July 21, 2026
- FY27 NDAA Resources — U.S. House Committee on Armed Services, checked July 21, 2026
- SASC Completes Markup of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2027 — U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services, checked July 21, 2026
- Cost estimate for H.R. 8800 — Congressional Budget Office, checked July 21, 2026
- FY2027 NDAA: Summary of Funding Authorizations (IN12703) — Congressional Research Service, checked July 21, 2026
- Senate NDAA rejects White House's tiered military pay raise, proposes 3.6% increase — Federal News Network, checked July 21, 2026
- Israel Defense Provision Blocked From House Vote Despite Bipartisan Push — Military.com, checked July 21, 2026
- Golden wins NDAA amendment to block Pentagon from sending U.S. shipbuilding jobs overseas — Office of Rep. Jared Golden, checked July 21, 2026
This tool accompanies our reporting — read the full story for context.
This is what modern SEO looks like: not just an article, but a useful resource people can return to, cite, and share. See how this newsroom is growing · See DavidWeaver's SEO packages
The story behind this tool
Politics
House passes $1.14 trillion 2027 defense bill, sending pay-raise and Israel-tech fights to the Senate
The House approved H.R. 8800, the roughly $1.14 trillion defense policy bill for fiscal 2027, on July 22 by a 219-206 vote. It now heads to the Senate, where a tiered troop pay raise and a contested U.S.-Israel defense-tech provision remain unsettled. It is not yet law.